FACT: Andy Roddick exists to give awesome interviews.
It starts awesome. Once they got started on American sports, I’m sure they were still speaking English – I just didn’t understand a single word of it.
Aside from that, I actually hate Letterman’s interviews with tennis players. Dude understands nothing, and inevitably, they end up talking about big serves.
Original. Really.
7 responses to “FACT: Andy Roddick exists to give awesome interviews.”
Leave a Reply
Who the hell is dootsiez?
Melbournian lawyer. Blogger. Unapologetic Federer tragic.
Need to contact me? Pop me a comment here, or find me on twitter or through the contact form above the header.
Go on, I don't bite. =)
All I need is a picket fence ... 
Nothing can beat Roddick’s interview with Wossy. “Is that a Swiss accent?” “I don’t know!”
Woah?! I haven’t seen that! :O *off to search*
Roddick always gives the funniest interviews, love his sense of humour – in Federer’s head indeed. But yeah that interview was much better.
I love Roddick interviews. It doesn’t matter that it’s Letterman in this case, because Roddick makes the interview. 😀
(But yes I agree Letterman knows nothing about the sport.)
dave should hire consultants once in a while….maybe someone should explain why a 19-2 record means andy couldn’t get in federer’s head!
Don’t hate on Letterman!!! But yeah they had the exact same conversation about his serve that they had in the 2003 interview.
yeah there ain’t much on individual major success letterman can catch on when it comes to andy…