Sunday Confessions.


1. Oh Rotterdam, I asked for Nole v Davo, instead I got Sod v Headclobber … and somehow, that’s even better.

Solid results aside, since his impressive victory over Fed in Qatar, Kolya’s tennis has downgraded from Playstation to Tamagotchi. In particular, his 5-set win over Nando in Melbourne, which was the single worst match I’ve ever had the misfortune of witnessing.

Not that the Sod’s been playing Xbox tennis either. He almost let a 5-2 lead slip in the first set, after Davydenko fought back to bring about a tiebreaker. But with a bit of self-destruction from Davo and solid serving from Sod, Davydenko conceded the tiebreak 5-7 and the Sod clicked into bonecrush mode, finishing off the second set 7-6, (3) 6-4.

2. Who is this pusher and what have you done with Novak Djokovic?

There was a time, back in 2007-08 when I thought Novak Djokovic was the biggest wanker in town. Much of that prejudice, I’m afraid, carried through to this day, but even in my dislike, I used to be able to appreciate Djokovic’s shot-making. When he was shooting his mouth off, there was a certain defiant vehemence in his game. He was aggressive, free-hitting; he was hungry and desperate – it seemed – for some respect as a contender in this sport.

He made it. He won a slam. He ended Roger Federer’s streak of 10 consecutive finals. What then?

These days, I watch Novak Djokovic and wonder where all that defiance I once hated went? Where did this complacency come from? What’s with the grinder mentality when you have such solid weapons off both wings? More importantly – what happened to the serve?

In his first tournament as the World No 2, Djoko was upset by Mikhail “Headclobber” Youzhny 7-6 (5) 7-6 (6). With this loss, Djoko has yet to beat a top 50 player in 2010.

Never has the gap between the World No 1 and 2 looked wider.

3. The cold hard truth:

2003-7: Weak era.
2008-early 2009: Weak era exposed.
2009-early 2010: Weak era resumes.

Or so some simpletons out there would want us to believe. To that I reply with all the smugness I’m capable of mustering: my guy has 16 slams. Nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh.

As if anything else mattered.

4. What I hate about the two sides of the Federer debate is that there is so little appreciation for nuance from either side.

Pete Bodo’s piece on the Fedal rivalry this week sparked the sort of mass outrage from Federer fans that should be only reserved for the worst of the world’s dictators. Douglas Perry from the Oregonian then wrote a stirring rebuttal to Bodo defending Roger’s achievements (clickey, or read GTT’s concise guide to the “asterisk debate”).

Here’s the deal: there is nothing you can say about Federer or Nadal that would come as news to me anymore. The war of words has been fought to death, now can we get more tennis from those two and less fandom crusades?

On the one hand, Rafa has become a convenient “go to” for Federer-haters too unwilling to take Federer’s GOAT status without a pinch of salt. And Rafa happens to be of the savoury variety. Yummy.

And yes – Rafa bothers Fed. It’s stylistic. It’s mental. It’s everything to do with the nature of this rivalry. It’s why we find it compelling for fuck sake.

Even as a Federer fan, I am perfectly capable of admitting all that.

On the other, one can’t help by laugh at the hypocrisy of those predicting anyone but Fed to win the Australian Open pre-tournament, spending the entire off-season waxing lyrical about how close the gap is at the top of the men’s game, only to have Fed fry eggs on their faces in the blistering Melbournian sun.

How else are they supposed to respond? By shoving an effing asterisk down our effing throat.

By trying to discredit Federer’s achievements with factors completely outside his control like who he gets on the other side of the net en route to a slam victory. By punishing him for playing “catch me if you can” with the rest of the ATP and winning.

Murray tried. Murray was in a better position to win a slam than he’d been all his career. Murray failed.

And now, the Fed-haters are freaking out.

Nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh.

xx doots

Tags: , , , , ,

9 responses to “Sunday Confessions.”

  1. pban says :

    Regarding the Fed Rafa rivalry articles…..why don’t these guys take a break, who cares.Our guy has 16 slams, Murray’s AO campaign and his obvious mental struggles during the final should be enough to make the critics appreciate the enormity of what Fed does.

  2. Warwick360 says :

    Seems like Simon reed’s and Peter Bodo’s wumming against federer will never end. But atleast Simon Reed made an apology, though it was too little, too late.

    Plus, Glad that Soderling won his first ATP 500….😀

  3. Jack says :

    The Pete Bodo piece just seems irrelevant to me! Like you said, Fed can’t help who he plays on in the final of Slams. He deserves to be there as does his opponent.
    Rafa may have given Fed the most trouble in the past, but I think its insulting to the other players to say he’s the only one who can trouble Fed.

    Plus I think people tend to forget that Fed has beaten Nadal twice in a Slam final. And even though Nadal did deserve Wimby 08 and AO 09, it wasn’t like Nadal steamrolled Federer in those finals. Plus, I believe Federer could have won those finals as he certainly had his chances.

  4. grace says :

    I agree with you but really who cares what journalist think, have they made a call to God? It´s so hard to accept Roger´s records?
    Well losers don´t really understand, don´t think like winners. That´s why they are losers.

  5. whynotme says :

    YAY for le Sod’s title tosday😀😀 Didn’t see the match and I read that Youzhny retired, but a win’s a win!

    And I don’t know either what happened to Novak. I saw him at Bercy, and in his last to matches, especially against Rafa in the semis, he was SCARY good. Relentlessly attacking, hitting all the right spots and playing beautiful tennis. But since then…. He basically did nothing great at all, losing early in London and Kooyong, and losing as soon as he faced a seeded player in both the AO and Rotterdam. This stat about top-50 players is appalling!! For the sake of the game, I hope he gets well soon. Gosh it seems that right now we’re saying that about basically every top tennis player apart from Roger and Mandy lol. So much for that density at the top of the game!

    Oh and here is another vid of Roger visiting Ethiopia, it’s in French as its from tsr.ch but you can all still look at the images😀 Nothing rellay new, but boy isn’t he the cutest thing when he’s interviewed in the bus?? http://bit.ly/fed-in-ethiopia

  6. flo says :

    i approve this message

  7. PJ says :

    Best quote to summarise all the stupid weak-era, Rafa-in-Fed’s-head crap that people come up with:

    To that I reply with all the smugness I’m capable of mustering: my guy has 16 slams. Nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh.

    Ya said it, Doots. xoxo

  8. Caillean says :

    question: would they be so honest to put an asterisk to an eventual victory of Rafa in a slam in which Roger retires?
    answer: no.they will climb over mirrors to say it’s a true victory nonetheless

    fact: ROGER NEVER RETIRES

    nuh nuh nuh nuh

  9. braggaditis says :

    Was nodding my head from start to finish.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: