Wimbly Day 4 (by PJ): It’s all about Court 18


We KNOW that Wimbledon Day 4 was all about this.

Court 18 FTW

This is probably a sight that will never be seen again, at least not for the next 150,000 years or so, I think. The Match That Would Never End finally ended with a scoreline of 70-68 in the 5th set, to John Isner. A match spanning over THREE days, twice suspended because of light, spanning 11 hours and 5 minutes and 183 games. The final set alone broke the record for the longest professional tennis match ever played, clocking at 8 hours and 11 minutes.

Times like these, I wish that a draw could be call in tennis. After a match like that, how can anyone be a loser? But the cruel fact is, there must be a ‘loser’ and that guy is Nicolas Mahut. After toughing it out for over 11 hours, refusing to give up when facing break points, he finally cracked at the very last break point – out of desperation? Fatigue? Pressure? It’s anyone’s guess.

It was really difficult to watch/read Mahut’s press conference. How can you not feel absolutely gutted for this guy? Similarly, if Isner had lost, most would have felt the same. In fact, I felt that they should just both go on court and play against De Bakker. Between them, on the next day, what stamina and energy that was left would probably still be less than De Bakker’s.

(Isner would then go on to lose in straight sets, serving 0 aces after serving 112 in the match, and committing a barrage of errors, no doubt due to fatigue.)

Of course, there is talk about this match being the greatest match ever. In terms of quality or breathtaking tennis or sublime shots, I respectfully disagree. The last set, at some point, was just each guy desperately holding onto their serve. Neither took chances to break, neither really risked it all to break each other and end the never-ending match. It was ace after ace, and three-to-five point rallies at most, balls finding the net often. So no, it wasn’t spectacular tennis. But in terms of sheer titanium uranium plutonium strength nerves, this is right up there. THAT kind of mental determination shown by both guys in the final set is scary, standing-ovation-worthy, history-making-worthy.

Mahut will probably not get over this for the next decade maybe, but hopefully, one day he will look back and appreciate the fact that he was, and always will be, part of history. Isner may have lost the next round in the tamest, shortest fashion, but he walked away as the victor of this epic match, and that was really something majorly significant.

At the end of the day, these two guys share a piece of sporting/tennis history, a place among the greatest stories of sports. For the years to come, as we talk about the records of Wimbledon, as we talk of Borg, Sampras, Federer  and so on, we will all talk about and remember the year 2010 at Wimbledon where two men who slugged it out and just plain refused to give up: John Isner and Nicolas Mahut.

I say the whole of ATP (and WTA as well, what the heck) go with Roger’s suggestion and throw these two a big ‘ole party when Wimbledon is over.

The other story of Day 4 was that Rafa Nadal got taken to 5 sets, by little-known Robin Haase, ranked 151 in the world. Haase had one break point in the first set, and converted that. Rafa set out to make things right again by taking the second set, but some cracking forehands by Haase paid off in the third set, and suddenly, Rafa was two sets to one down, and would have to play five sets to win. And won he did – with a bagel in the fourth set. I didn’t finish watching the match (fell asleep in midst of Haase’s trip to the bakery) so I have no idea how the fifth set went. But it’s probably sufficed to say that Rafa had that little something in the end, and he pulled through. Still, props to Haase for putting up a fight, as gallant as he could give.

We’ve all heard of the Batman Complex, but Rafa may be the first to suffer the Robin Complex.

The other “big news”, and I put that in inverted commas because I sort of couldn’t care less, was the visit of Her Majesty Queenie Lizzie. The only reason I cared a lot was because I get to see Feddy in a suit, and a green/purple striped tie. Heh. So, Queenie dropped by, and had lunch with a bunch of players, caught Mandy’s demolishment of poor Jarkko Nieminen, and went off with a royal wave.  And Feddy was interviewed after that, looking dapper in his suit with perfect hair.

Rafa missed her because of his meticulous pre-match routine, and seeing how he was stretched to five sets yesterday, I’d wager he was setting up a praying altar to his water-bottles, thanking them that he didn’t break his routine.

Other notable players that made it through: Bobby Sod avenged his Australian Open defeat to Granola Bar, beating him in straights. Jo-Willy and NKOTB Dolgopolov tried to pull off an Isner-Mahut, but fell just a little bit short, ending fifth set at 10-8 in Jo’s favour.

Now, I don’t follow women’s tennis as closely as Dootsiez, and I don’t really have much to say on the ladies, except the big names are still in – Serena and Vee cruising, Jankovic and Wozniacki still hanging around, as with Shrieky Sharaporva. I’ll probably talk more about WTA once we get to the later rounds, because that will be when I maybe sort of know all of them.

And while I sign this off, Feddykins has just won his third-round match against Arnaud Clément. Comfortably. More on that tomorrow.

G’night all,
PJ

Advertisements

Tags: , , ,

About PJ

I'm a tennis nut. Loves watching and freaking out over tennis, and as of late, writing about tennis. As a player though, I'm terrible. My other interests includes reading (pretty much will give any genre a go), checking out films, crafting (making cards, scrapbooking etc), eating/food (specifically searching for the perfect chendol outside Malaysia). I'm also trying to find my own perfect corner in this world!

16 responses to “Wimbly Day 4 (by PJ): It’s all about Court 18”

  1. pban says :

    Totally agree about your opinion regarding calling the Isner Mahut match the grreatest ever…that title goes to the match which I certainly don’t recall ever 😦 .As for Feddy all I wanted was a short match after all the mental exertions I went thru in his 1st 2 rounds since Melzer will certainly make me frazzle to my wits end. Anyway 2 days of rest before the sick feeling returns so just rest up all you guys.

    • PJ says :

      Ugh, I know which match you are talking about. And ugh I don’t want to remember.

      Yeap, I get what you mean. I used to hope his matches last a little longer so that I can look at more pretty hair and amazing play, but after that first two rounds…6-0, 6-0, 6-0 in half hour sounds awesome to me. Heh.

      Tomorrow will be Frazzle Day. We will all be there, and with Doots on Centre Court in spirit!

  2. breadstix says :

    Word on Isner-Mahut (Masner? Isnut?), and I agree with you when you say that they just refused to give up. After all, it takes 2 to tango. Whilst watching Issy v de Bakker, I kinda wished that the marathon match wasn’t a R1 match since it feels like a terrible shame for the participants to have exited the tourney so early. But oh well, better luck to them both next year, and I hope to god they don’t meet each other again too early on, hah!

    ‘We’ve all heard of the Batman Complex, but Rafa may be the first to suffer the Robin Complex.’
    LOL
    Woger had a Wimby tie! :O awsm.

    • PJ says :

      I agree, it’s a pity that it was a marathon R1 match. We all know whoever the victor is, he wouldn’t go far. And he didn’t. That’s tennis life for ya. But what a match.

      Isn’t his Wimbly tie made of the awesome? Green and purple striped! And his little membership badge. So adorkable.

      • breadstix says :

        “Green and purple striped! And his little membership badge.”
        As if Wogie isn’t squishy enough already. :3

  3. Ben says :

    Nice post. I enjoyed reading it a lot.

  4. Jack says :

    I agree with you, it was not the greatest match of all time. It was more a serving contest and a test of their mental will. That’s not taking anything away from their effort as they both deserve so much credit for refusing to give up. But I think we all knew that whoever won, they would have no chance in the next round!

    And I just think the Queen came to Wimbledon for a free lunch and the Wimbledon trophies! 😀

    • PJ says :

      Yeap. Fantastic tennis it wasn’t really. Fantastic battle of wills and nerves? That and more.

      Queenie is probably a secret fan of Rogie Wogie. She’s probably jealous that her son gets to meet him, so she’s all “IT’S MY TURN!”

  5. jfK says :

    Okay I’m confused, why did they let the Queen have the trophies? What was that all about?

  6. Dippy says :

    PJ, totally with you that Isner/mahut is not greatest match of all time. Its longest match period. Not taking anything away from both players, they do deserve highest recognition for not giving up. King Fed always has greatest ideas – ATP should do something to celebrate their achievement, great sportsmanship and good tennis played.

    p/s: great writing, hope to read your next blog entry

    • PJ says :

      A big partay to celebrate after Wimbly seems fitting. And of course, I hope us FedKads have a great reason to have the hugest partay, too. 😀 And ATP really should. You mention sportsmanship, which was nothing short of amazing in that match. Neither took medical timeouts. Neither complained or whined or whinged. They just got out there, and played their hearts out. And after everything was over, such nice words from Isner and Mahut both, and I can see a genuine camaraderie there.

      And thank you for the kind words! 🙂

  7. Mia says :

    [Rafa missed her because of his meticulous pre-match routine, and seeing how he was stretched to five sets yesterday, I’d wager he was setting up a praying altar to his water-bottles, thanking them that he didn’t break his routine.]

    LMAO. Good thing Fed is not superstitious, no. Although I wonder if he still carries around that Tweety Bird that Mirka gifted him with, purportedly early in their couplehood. Wonder if that was some inner joke between them, too. 🙂

    • PJ says :

      I was always trying to look for that Tweety without avail! Maybe it’s tucked into his bag instead of hanging out for all to see.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: