In comfort and pain.

muzz

Dootsie’s Universal Theory of Everything,
(also known as 1 + 2 + 3 = win)

1. Pure fucking brilliance

fed lundgren

2. TRANSFER of pure fucking brilliance

STAN LUNDGREN

3. PURE FUCKING EXCELLENCE TRANSFERRED.

stan

= WIN. Coincidence? Idunfinksobitch.

This is the fate that has befallen Scotland in the last 24 hours:

“Andy Murray falls apart and exits US Open with a whimper” – Guardian
“KO’d Murray: I don’t know if I’ll win a Grand Slam.” – The Sun (doth set)
“SHOCKED AND STANNED!” – The Mirror
“Murray a casualty of Waw” – Skysports

The last two puns are only slightly lame. Slightly.

What’s to say about the match? Wawrinka should’ve won the first set, but didn’t. Murray could’ve won the last one, yet he let it go. But really, it was just 4 sets of bizarre ebbs and flows, see-saw momentum that somehow always ended up swinging Stan’s way. At the end of the day, no one saw this coming.

Stanislas Wawrinka? That Swissy growing a double chin, always second best to – yer know – the other Swissy that’s the best?

To beat Murray? Pre-tournament favourite, winner of the US Open Series, taking out Nadal and Federer in straight sets back-to-back. Proud owner of this supposedly prized asset named “newfound aggression” …

You cannot be serious.

The truth is, I’ve never seen a killer in Stan. His usual forays into giant-killing terrains inevitably ended in dismay. The exception being Monte Carlo 2009, 2 days after Federer made a post-wedding last minute decision to take Mirka shopping in a tax-free haven.

In other words, it counts but it doesn’t count. The man is dubbed Ewok for a reason.

bbewok

Although it was Jedi Ewok who turned up to the match today.

ewok

Perhaps there is a killer in there after all.

Make no mistake: Stan played aggressively, took it to Mandy with some inspired shotmaking. But he was only able to do so because Murray went back to his passive-aggressive hole, unwilling to pull the trigger. He gave Stan too much breathing space, played with exasperation, rather than inspiration, and Stan? He simply thrived on these vibes.

And we’re back to where we started: another year, another slamless season. Tennis Karma dictates that I do not kick a player when he’s down, so here’s my attempt to look at it without kicking.

As human beings, we all have comfort zones. We have habits, mindsets, behaviors and signposts that keep us grounded and make us who we are. We can continue to push outside those comfort zones and challenge ourselves, but this works particularly well if it is done on our own terms and at our initiative. When we’re pushed outside our comfort zone against our will, we start to cling on to those habits, default mindsets and signposts of comfort, because those are always the reference point to our identity.

Yes. I realise I’m making little sense with this bullshit here.

Late 2009, Rafael Nadal was struggling, both physically and mentally. Low in confidence, not trusting his own body, Nadal reverted back to the sort of game on hard court that I saw him play in 05 and 06 (essentially BYO-Clay-Court). Rafa was still dangerous, but he wasn’t lethal. The gravy on top – the improvements he made to his game – came after his confidence was gradually restored.

A Fed example – early 2009, when Roger effectively suffered from the same physical and emotional problems (bad back, crisis of confidence in the media), he began hitting his forehand with the desperation of a man starved for exhilaration. How many times did we see him move around his backhand to shank a forehand STRAIGHT INTO THE FUCKING NET? (Too many, I tell ya).

The point being that these characteristics form – if you like – the comfort zone. When put in a situation of distress or self-doubt, the first thing Rafa reverted back to was his more defensive, more clay-court game, regardless of surface he was on. Same with Roger, who went to his forehand like his life depended on it. These are the leopard spots that don’t change, the default mode. Everything else is a matter of how much gravy these players can summon up and put on top of their game.

In the case of Murray, his comfort zone is his passivity. There is no question that he can play aggressively on his own terms and his initiative. But when under pressure, on a bad day, Murray’s go-to for “weathering the storm” is to wait for his opponent to give him something. Very often they do, but this passivity is no defense against a streak of inspiration. Verdasco, Cilic and Wawrinka all taught us as much. Murray, as good a player as he is (or can be), is still very much vulnerable to the whims of form, environment, his opponent’s inspirations and most of all – his own exasperations. That exasperation (misery?) is also a part of his default mode.

I’m not going to speculate if Murray has a slam in him. Yes, time is ticking, but right now, it is still on his side. But what I take away from this loss is that rather than waiting for the holy trinity of factors (environment, form and opponents) to fall into place for his first slam, Muzz will have to learn to deal better with being put outside his comfort zone against his will.

Last but not least, since I link everything back to Fed without fail, does this not underscore the retarded consistency of Federer at slams since 2004? The fact that he has never been burnt out or hampered by injuries to the extent of being upset in the first week? (We came close this year, but no cigar).

The next time someone in the media starts touting Djokovic or Murray pre-slam at the expense of Fed, remember this: Federer has won 16 times Djokovic’s slam count, and as for Muzz’s slam count – OH SHIT –

ZERO

Karma’s a bitch. She’ll get me back.

xx doots

Tags: ,

14 responses to “In comfort and pain.”

  1. breadstix says :

    Yeah, as much as I’m… not that keen on Murray, I am beginning to worry about when, if ever, he’s going to string together the 7 wins that he needs at a Slam. Maybe he’s in need of some essense of Fed too (thatsoundsreallyweird). In the meantime, YAYSTAN.❤

  2. Matt Zemek says :

    Yeah, I’ve finally had to accept that I should. Not. Pick. Murray. To. Win. A. Major.

    He has to go out and prove that he can get his sh— together.

    Murray is the Duck Phillips of men’s tennis, for anyone who saw the ridiculously good episode of Mad Men last night.

    • flo says :

      So Roger is Don? And Rafa is Peggy (I can’t bring myself to say Pete because he is a weasel)? Or is he Lane Pryce?

      As of now Nadal is the heavy favourite…Fed is no. 2 followed by Djoko, Soderling, Fish…

      I think Murray might underestimate some of the lesser opponents and doesn’t want to come out of his shell against them. Nadal and Federer, he knows he needs to take it to them a bit…Warwrinka he thinks his natural game is solid enough….also I believe his story about fitness/health problems even though there were no real signs prior.

      • jfk says :

        Roger is def. Don Draper❤
        Don't know why ppl are already talking about a Fedal final. Roger's got a lot of work to do before the final.

      • dootsiez says :

        Roger is Don? Um … he’s a genius and he knows it. So I guess …

        although, when it comes to alcohol and womanising, I’d put Marat in Don’s shoes.

        Flo – don’t you see a weasel in Rafa? I do. Although infinitely more likeable and less backstabbing than Pete, for sure.

  3. pban says :

    I have nothing to add except that the open is just panning itself out for Rafa,simply don’t see Djoko or Sod doing anything against him as for Feddy I have been picking him to lose each round so I have no hope. And what is Gwen doing in Arthur Ashe get her out NAAO!!! Some people just never learn

    • BS says :

      Gwen was in Arthur Ashe?! Oh no. I wondered if she was when Gavin was beside Mirka during the Mathieu match. She’ll never just take the hint.

  4. BS says :

    I’ve never thought that Murray will win a slam, and I’m still of the same opinion. I believe he has the ability, but the immense pressure he must feel from his home nation is what’s holding him back. He’ll be on the wrong side of 23 come the AO and if he hasn’t won a major by 25, I think his chances are gone.

  5. Online forms says :

    Those that cannot apply for this kind of card or that would prefer a different solution could consider a prepaid card that comes with
    a credit building element as an alternative. You might get one or more benefits of outline designer along with it
    is the ideal means to unleash the capacities.

    You can make corrections directly instead of having to search mistake through the code, if something does not seem OK for you.

  6. online form generator says :

    Horizontal Siding and Vertical Sliding refers to the outer layer of a wall, with shingles or boards or gaps subtly angled to shed
    water. It’s easy to use a fake IP address on i – Phone and i – Pad, but you need to know what you need the fake IP for. You can make corrections directly instead of having to search mistake through the code, if something does not seem OK for you.

  7. online form builder says :

    Flash web designers will like the cost and the creativity of the Trendy Flash Site Builder.

    Wouldn’t it be easier if we could be able to save changes ourselves whenever we want. Decide now because if you are a weight lifter, you will not build the chest that you are looking for.

  8. online form generator says :

    Horizontal Siding and Vertical Sliding refers to the outer layer of
    a wall, with shingles or boards or gaps subtly angled to shed
    water. You might get one or more benefits of outline designer along with it
    is the ideal means to unleash the capacities. Decide now because if you are a weight lifter, you will not build the
    chest that you are looking for.

  9. online form generator says :

    Horizontal Siding and Vertical Sliding refers to the outer layer of a wall, with shingles or boards or gaps subtly
    angled to shed water. You might get one or more benefits of outline
    designer along with it is the ideal means to unleash the capacities.
    Net’s builder has been out for a little more than a year, yet it already helped more than 5,000 webmasters to create their online forms.

  10. visual form builder says :

    So, what you think might be the technicality hidden inside
    the making of these forms. Once you have decide to use a list to build your business, you will need
    to advertise the site that you have put your opt-in form
    on to gain subscribers to your list. There is not any real proof that training can
    benefit from protein supplements.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: